WARNING: ACCORDING TO SOME PARENTS IN TOWNS ACROSS AMERICA THESE BOOKS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR YOU
“Vulgar…”
“Inappropriate…”
“Damaging…”
Summer: for some it means a time to work, for others a time to play, and for many it’s a time, after 9 months of assigned school reading, to choose your own books, to decide what you want to read.
Unfortunately, if the last week is any indication, summer is also a time for some parents in towns across the country to challenge young adult literature, a time to fight to ban books from schools and public libraries.
Today the Chicago Tribune reports that some parents in Antioch, IL, just outside of Chicago, want Sherman Alexie’s National Book Award-winning novel, The Absolutely True Story of a Part-Time Indian, eliminated from the incoming freshman summer reading curriculum (even though an alternate book is offered). Meanwhile, down in Leesburg, Florida last week, two moms were interviewed on Fox News Channel’s “Fox and Friends” morning show because they want the Gossip Girl series removed from the young adult section of their local library (a request which was rejected by the library’s board). In New Hampshire a group of parents succeeded last week in dropping short stories by Ernest Hemingway, Stephen King, and David Sedaris from English curriculum while the D.C. public school system, working below the radar, yanked every single LGBTQ-themed book from summer reading lists. And, in West Bend, WI, a group of citizens are fighting for their right to burn – yes, burn – their local library’s copies of Francesca Lia Block’s Baby Be-Bop, a book that is part of the Weetzie Bat series, and, according to Block, “a very sweet, simpl
e, coming-of-age story about a young man’s discovery that he’s gay.”
Books and stories for young adults have a long history of being challenged. (Check out Chris Crutcher’s website to see how many times his books have been challenged in the last year). But, does the spate of book challenges across the country in dicate a growing trend towards more censorship of books for young adults or are these situations a cluster of isolated incidents?
In almost all these instances parents object to the “vulgar” language in these stories, claim the books are “racist,” and are offended by the description of (or reference to) sexual acts included in the books. Often times in these situations, as in West Bend, WI, the protesters claim that the book(s) defy Christian principles. (Read an interview with one of the people fighting t o protect Baby Be-Bop from these attacks.) Some parents claim they don’t want to ban the books, but want warning labels affixed to their covers (like those on movies, video games, and music). What do you think? Is a warning label a form of censorship? Is it censorship if a young adult librarian is forced to remove books from her collection to another part of the library? Should a small group of parents get to decide what a library’s patrons or a school’s student body can and can not have access to?
LATE UPDATE: The Tribune reports that the Antioch school board has decided to keep Sherman Alexie’s book on the reading list. The board reached this decision in part because many parents voiced their support for the book.
LATER UPDATE: For those curious, none of the embattled books pictured above were removed from schools or libraries as a result of their challenges. In all cases both school boards and library boards stood by the books and kept them on the shelves.










